top of page

A Cost Segregation Study: Accelerated Depreciation for Real Estate Owners

  • Writer: Christian Wolff
    Christian Wolff
  • Oct 8
  • 4 min read
Modern residential house with well-maintained landscaping, showcasing distinct building components that may be evaluated separately in a cost segregation study for accelerated depreciation.

A cost segregation study is a strategic tax tool used by real estate owners to accelerate depreciation deductions on their properties. Rather than depreciating the entire building over the standard 27.5 years for residential real estate or 39 years for commercial property, cost segregation allows for the identification and reclassification of specific components of the property into shorter-lived asset categories. These reclassified assets—such as certain types of electrical systems, flooring, cabinetry, or land improvements—can often be depreciated over five, seven, or fifteen years. The result is a significant increase in allowable depreciation deductions during the early years of ownership, which reduces taxable income and enhances cash flow.


The process of conducting a cost segregation study involves a detailed analysis of the property by qualified professionals, typically including engineers, construction specialists, and tax advisors. Through physical inspections, review of architectural and engineering plans, examination of construction documents, and analysis of project costs, these professionals prepare a report that itemizes the building components and assigns each to its appropriate tax classification. This documentation supports the accelerated depreciation deductions and helps ensure compliance in the event of an IRS audit.


Cost segregation is commonly applied when a property is newly acquired, constructed, or substantially renovated. It may also be used retroactively through a look-back analysis, allowing owners to claim missed depreciation deductions from prior years without amending past tax returns. The tax savings generated by the study can be substantial, particularly when paired with bonus depreciation provisions that currently allow qualifying short-lived assets to be fully deducted in the year they are placed in service. Under current tax law, this immediate expensing can result in very large deductions, especially in the year the property is acquired or improved.


Despite the clear financial advantages, cost segregation is not without limitations. One key consideration is depreciation recapture. When a property is sold, the IRS requires the recapture of depreciation taken on certain assets, and the gain associated with those deductions is taxed at ordinary income rates. This recapture can reduce the net tax benefit of the strategy, particularly if the property is not held for a significant period. However, if the sale qualifies as a like-kind exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, the gain and recapture may be deferred, provided no non-like-kind property or cash is received.


Another important limitation relates to the passive activity loss (PAL) rules. For most taxpayers, rental real estate income is considered passive, and any losses generated by accelerated depreciation—such as those identified in a cost segregation study—can generally only be used to offset other passive income. If the taxpayer does not have sufficient passive income in the current year, these losses must be carried forward to offset future passive income.


However, there are exceptions. Individuals who actively participate in rental real estate activities and have a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of $100,000 or less may be able to deduct up to $25,000 of passive losses against non-passive income, such as wages or business income. This special allowance gradually phases out between $100,000 and $150,000 of MAGI, disappearing completely above that range.


Additionally, individuals who qualify as real estate professionals under IRS guidelines may be able to treat rental real estate losses as non-passive, allowing them to offset active income without the $25,000 cap or income-based phase-out. This can result in significant immediate tax savings, but strict documentation and qualification standards apply.


The cost of a cost segregation study can be significant and is typically based on the size, complexity, and use of the property. For high-value or income-producing properties, the upfront cost is often justified by the resulting tax savings. However, for smaller properties or properties held for a short duration, the net benefit may be more limited. Because of this, property owners should evaluate the potential return on investment before proceeding with a study.


In summary, cost segregation is a well-established method of accelerating depreciation to reduce taxable income and improve short-term cash flow for property owners. When properly executed, it can unlock significant tax deferral opportunities and increase the after-tax profitability of a real estate investment. However, it requires careful planning, accurate documentation, and an understanding of the longer-term tax implications, including depreciation recapture and passive loss limitations. Real estate investors considering a cost segregation study should consult experienced tax professionals to determine whether this strategy aligns with their overall financial objectives and ownership plans.


The information provided in this blog post is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information, tax laws and regulations are subject to change, and individual circumstances may vary. For personalized advice and to ensure compliance with current tax laws, it is strongly recommended that you consult with a qualified tax professional, financial advisor, or legal counsel. The author and publisher of this blog assume no responsibility for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information contained herein.

Comments


bottom of page